Choosing between cross-securitisation vs stand-alone loans isn’t just a technical decision — it’s really about how much flexibility and control you want over your finances. Both setups can help you use your equity and build your property portfolio, but they behave very differently when the market shifts or when you need to refinance.
Once you understand the key differences, it becomes much easier to choose a structure that supports your long-term goals rather than getting in the way of them.
In this guide, written by an expert mortgage broker in Brisbane, we’ll break down how each option works, the pros and cons, and the scenarios where one strategy can save you a lot of stress — and money — over the long run.
What Is Cross-Securitisation?
Cross-securitisation (also called cross-collateralization) is when a single loan, or multiple loans, is secured by more than one property. The lender uses all properties in the group as combined security.
How It Works — Simple Example
- You want to buy an investment property for $500,000.
- You already own your home outright, valued at $1 million.
- Instead of saving for a 20% deposit plus stamp duty and other costs, you can borrow the full $525,000 to cover both the purchase and associated expenses.
- The bank secures the loan across both properties (combined value: $1.5 million).
- With a combined LVR of 35%, this provides strong equity backing and may help you access better interest rates.
This structure lets you leverage the equity in your existing property without creating multiple loan accounts.
How To Qualify For A Cross-Collateralisation Loan In Australia
Cross-collateralisation isn’t a special type of loan — it’s simply a way the bank links your properties together behind the scenes. But not everyone will qualify for it. Lenders want to see a few key things before they’re comfortable tying multiple properties into one lending structure. Here are the 6 things they look for (and how it works in the real world):
1. You’ve Got Enough Equity to Make It Work
To cross-collateralise, you’ll need solid usable equity in one or more properties.
Most lenders want the combined LVR to stay under 80%, because anything above that usually means LMI.
If you need to borrow more than 80%, that’s still doable — but expect the bank to go over every property with a fine-tooth comb.
2. Your Income Can Comfortably Support the Combined Debt
Because your properties are linked, banks want to feel confident you can handle the bigger picture financially. They’ll run through:
- Your PAYG or self-employed income
- Any existing loans or credit limits
- Your day-to-day living expenses
- And how you’d cope if interest rates moved up
It’s all about proving the structure won’t put you under pressure.
3. Your Credit File Looks Clean and Reliable
A tidy credit history goes a long way.
No recent defaults, no late payments, and sensible credit usage all help the bank feel comfortable grouping your properties together.
4. You’re in Stable, Consistent Employment
Most banks prefer:
- 6–12 months in your current role (if you’re PAYG), or
- Two years of financials if you’re self-employed
It shows stability — which is even more important when multiple properties sit behind one loan structure.
5. All Properties Meet the Bank’s Valuation and Risk Tests
Here’s the part many people miss: every property in the structure has to “tick the box.”
Banks will look at:
- The location
- The condition of the property
- Whether it’s easy to resell
- Recent comparable sales
If even one property doesn’t stack up, the whole cross-collateralised setup can fall over.
6. You’ve Got a Clear Strategy for Why You’re Using This Structure
Banks are more likely to approve cross-collateralisation if:
- You’re using equity from one property to buy another
- You want to keep everything under one lender for simplicity
- You’re consolidating multiple loans into one relationship
That said, most good brokers (including us at Hunter Galloway) only recommend cross-collateralization when there’s a strong strategic reason for it — because while it can make things easy upfront, it can reduce flexibility later.
Pros & Cons Of Cross-Securitisation
Cross-securitisation can work well in the right situation. However, it also carries real risks that many borrowers overlook. Below, we break down the key advantages and limitations so you can decide if this structure supports your long-term strategy.
Advantages of Cross-Securitisation
1. You Can Use Existing Equity to Cover the Full Purchase Price
- Cross-securitisation lets you tap into your property’s equity without setting up separate loans.
- This can cover the entire purchase price and associated costs, including stamp duty and legal fees.
- Many investors use this approach to buy sooner because they avoid saving a new cash deposit.
2. One Loan Structure Can Simplify Your Banking Setup
- Instead of juggling multiple loans, lenders, and repayment schedules, you manage everything under one structure.
- This setup can make monthly budgeting easier and reduce account fees.
- Some borrowers prefer this because it centralises their lending relationship.
3. Lower Overall LVR Can Lead to Sharper Interest Rates
- When multiple properties are tied together, the combined LVR often drops.
- Banks may reward a lower LVR with reduced interest rates or better product options.
- This can improve cash flow and help you repay debt faster.
What Are The Cons Of Cross Collateralization?
1. The Bank Controls What Happens When You Sell
- If you sell one property, the lender must revalue the remaining securities.
- They do this to ensure the remaining loan still meets their LVR requirements.
- This process can slow down settlement because the bank decides how much of the sale proceeds you keep.
2. You May Receive Less Cash After the Sale
- If valuations come in low, the bank can hold back some of your sale proceeds to protect their risk position.
- This can affect your next purchase or delay your ability to reinvest.
3. You Lose Flexibility Because You’re Tied to One Lender
- Cross-securitisation links your properties together.
- As a result, you cannot move one loan to a new lender without unravelling the entire structure.
- This reduces your ability to negotiate better rates or switch for a sharper deal.
4. Refinancing Becomes More Complex
- Refinancing multiple securities is much harder than refinancing a single stand-alone loan.
- The bank must revalue every linked property, which adds cost and time.
- If even one property performs poorly, the whole refinance can fall over.
Summary Table: Pros & Cons of Cross-Securitisation
Advantages | What It Means |
Use existing equity to fund the full purchase price | Lets you access equity without creating extra loans, covering property price + costs and avoiding the need for a fresh cash deposit. |
Simplifies your banking structure | One lender, one structure, and fewer accounts to manage. Easier budgeting and potentially fewer fees. |
Lower combined LVR may unlock better rates | Combining properties can reduce your overall LVR. Banks often reward lower LVRs with sharper interest rates or better loan features. |
Limitations | What It Means |
Bank controls sale proceeds | Selling one property triggers a revaluation of the remaining properties, and the lender decides how much of the sale funds you keep. |
You may walk away with less cash | Low valuations can lead the bank to retain a larger slice of your sale proceeds, impacting future purchases. |
Reduced flexibility due to one-lender tie-in | All properties are linked, making it hard to switch lenders or restructure individual loans. |
Refinancing becomes more complicated | All linked security properties must be revalued. One poor valuation can block the entire refinance. |
What Are Stand-Alone Securities?
Stand-alone securities keep each loan tied to a single property. Each asset secures its own loan, and nothing is cross-linked. This structure gives you more control because one property does not affect another when you refinance, sell, or switch lenders.
How Stand-Alone Loans Work (Using the Same Example)
Let’s use the same numbers to make the comparison clear. Instead of one combined $525,000 loan, you split the lending across two properties:
- Loan 1: $400,000 secured only by the new $500,000 investment property. This keeps the loan at an 80% LVR, so you avoid Lenders Mortgage Insurance.
- Loan 2: $125,000 secured only by your home. Your home remains separate, and its equity is clearly defined.
The total borrowing still equals $525,000, but the structure is completely different. Each property stands alone with its own loan, its own security, and its own risk profile.
This setup avoids the hidden complications that come with cross-collateralisation, especially when property values move or when you need to release equity quickly.
Pros & Cons Of Stand-Alone Securities
Stand-alone securities give borrowers more flexibility and control because each property is secured on its own. This structure is often preferred by investors who want clearer equity positions and easier refinancing options. Below are the key advantages and considerations to keep in mind.
Advantages of Stand-Alone Securities
1. Easy to Sell or Refinance Without Affecting Other Properties
Stand-alone loans let you move quickly because each property is separate. You can sell one property or refinance it without any impact on the others. This saves time and avoids the delays that often appear in cross-securitised setups.
2. Cleaner and More Predictable Equity Calculations
Because each loan stands alone, you know exactly how much equity you hold in each property. This makes it easier to plan future purchases, calculate borrowing power and estimate sale proceeds. Investors often prefer this clarity when building a portfolio.
3. Risk Stays Contained to a Single Loan or Property
If one property underperforms or becomes difficult to service, the risk remains isolated. Your other loans and properties are protected because they are not tied together. This is especially helpful when markets shift or rental income changes.
4. Freedom to Shop Around for Better Rates and Features
You’re not locked to one lender, so you can choose the best lender for each property. This gives you more negotiation power and makes rate shopping easier. Many borrowers use this approach to improve cash flow or access more flexible loan features.
Considerations of Stand-Alone Securities
1. Multiple Loans Can Mean More Accounts to Manage
Stand-alone structures may require separate loan accounts and offset accounts. This can add some admin work, especially for large portfolios. Good loan structuring helps keep everything organised.
2. You May Need to Apply Separately to Access Equity
Because properties aren’t linked, you must complete a new application to release equity. This can add extra steps and require updated valuations. However, it also prevents equity from being unintentionally tied up across properties.
3. Banks May Still Use an “All-Monies Clause”
Some lenders, especially those within the same banking group, include an all-monies clause. This allows them to use any property you hold with them as security if you default. A good mortgage broker helps structure loans to minimise this risk.
Summary Table: Pros & Cons of Stand-Alone Securities
Advantages | What It Means |
Sell or refinance without affecting other properties | Each loan is tied to one property, so changes to one loan don’t impact your full portfolio. |
Clear, predictable equity calculations | You always know how much equity belongs to each property, making planning and future borrowing easier. |
Risk stays isolated to one loan/property | If one property underperforms, it does not place other properties at risk. |
Freedom to use different lenders | You can shop around for the best rates, features and lending policies for each property. |
Considerations | What It Means |
More accounts to manage | Multiple loans may mean extra statements, offsets or loan splits to keep track of. |
Equity access requires separate applications | You must reapply and get valuations each time you want to release equity from a property. |
Banks may still apply an all-monies clause | Some lenders can still use any property you hold with them as security if you default. |
Cross-Securitisation vs Stand-Alone Securities: When Each Structure Works Best
Choosing the right loan structure depends on your goals, risk tolerance and future plans. Both setups work well in different scenarios, but they come with very different levels of flexibility and control. Here’s when each approach typically makes the most sense for Australian borrowers.
When Cross-Securitisation Works Best
- You want maximum borrowing power by combining equity across properties to lower your overall LVR. This can unlock sharper rates and help you buy sooner. CoreLogic reports an 8.5% annual rise in Australian property values, increasing usable equity for many owners.
- You prefer a simple, consolidated loan setup with one lender and fewer moving parts, making management easier for first-time investors or busy families.
- You have long-term hold plans and don’t expect to sell soon, avoiding the need for lender approval and revaluations.
- You want to avoid LMI by spreading equity across properties to keep your overall LVR under 80%, which can save thousands in upfront costs.
When Stand-Alone Securities Work Best
- You expect to sell, upgrade or refinance within a few years and want flexibility without lender re-approval to release securities.
- You want lender diversification to access better rates or policies by using different lenders for different properties.
- You want clear separation between home and investment debt to simplify tax deductions, record-keeping and equity planning.
- You are risk-averse and want each property protected so one underperforming asset cannot affect your entire portfolio or family home.
Cross-Securitisation vs Stand-Alone Securities (Visual Comparison Table)
Feature | Cross-Securitisation | Stand-Alone Securities |
Borrowing Power | Highest — equity pooled across properties | Moderate — borrowing capped per property |
Loan Structure | One combined loan secured by multiple properties | Separate loans for each property |
Flexibility | Low — selling or refinancing triggers reassessment | High — easy to sell or refinance individually |
Refinancing Ease | Harder due to linked securities | Easier because each loan stands alone |
Risk Exposure | Higher — one property’s issues affect all | Lower — risk contained to each asset |
Equity Access | Fast — shared equity boosts usable funds | Slower — equity released per property |
LMI Avoidance | Easier by spreading equity | Harder, may require higher deposits |
Lender Choice | Limited to one lender | Wide — mix lenders to optimise rates |
Administration | Easier — single loan package | More accounts and statements to manage |
Best For | Rapid portfolio growth, long-term holds | Flexibility, future selling, refinancing, diversification |
To make an informed decision, it’s advisable to work with a reputable mortgage broker who can guide you through the pros and cons of each option and help structure your loans accordingly. At Hunter Galloway, we offer our mortgage brokering services throughout Australia without any fees. Get in touch with us for a free assessment or give us a call at 1300 088 065 to receive expert assistance in understanding these loan structures and finding the right solution for your needs.
Real-Life Case Studies: How Loan Structures React in Different Scenarios
Understanding loan structures isn’t just theory. Let’s look at three case studies showing how cross-securitisation and stand-alone loans respond to market changes, sales, and refinancing.
Case Study 1: Property Value Drop — John and Kate’s Investment
Background:
- John and Kate own a home worth $800,000 and an investment property at $700,000.
- They took a cross-collateralised loan of $600,000, giving a combined LVR of 40%.
Scenario: Property values drop by 20%.
Outcome:
- Combined property value falls to $1.2 million, raising the LVR to 50%.
- This reduces their refinancing options and makes it harder to access additional equity.
If They Had Used Stand-Alone Loans:
- Only the investment property’s LVR rises, while the home remains untouched.
- Their borrowing power from the home stays intact, keeping overall portfolio risk lower.
Lesson: Cross-secured loans amplify risk when property values drop. Stand-alone loans isolate risk to individual properties.
Case Study 2: Selling a Property — Emily’s Investment Exit
Background:
- Emily owns a cross-secured investment property valued at $700,000, linked to her primary place of residence of $800,000, total loan $600,000.
Scenario: She sells the investment property after a 20% market decline.
Outcome:
- Sale price: $560,000.
- Bank may hold back funds to maintain security across the remaining property, leaving Emily with only $500,000 free for reinvestment.
If She Had Used a Stand-Alone Loan:
- Once the investment loan is repaid, she keeps the full A$560,000.
- Her home loan remains unaffected, giving full liquidity for her next investment.
Lesson: Stand-alone loans provide clearer sale proceeds and faster access to cash. Cross-secured loans can delay or reduce available funds.
Case Study 3: Refinancing for a Better Rate — Bowen and Mei’s Rate Hunt
Background:
- Bowen and Mei have a cross-collateralised loan of $600,000 across a $800,000 home and a $700,000 investment property.
Scenario: They want to refinance to a lender offering a lower rate.
Outcome:
- The lender requires revaluation of both properties.
- The investment property revalues at A$560,000, increasing the combined LVR.
- The refinance may fail or be limited, blocking access to better rates.
If They Had Used Stand-Alone Loans:
- They refinance the investment property independently.
- The home loan is untouched, and the new lender evaluates only the investment property.
- Access to lower rates is faster and simpler.
Lesson: Stand-alone loans make refinancing smoother and more flexible. Cross-secured structures add complexity and risk.
Key Takeaways From These Case Studies
- Cross-securitisation works best for long-term holders with strong equity.
- Stand-alone loans protect individual properties and simplify sales, refinancing, and risk management.
- Always stress-test your portfolio with realistic market shifts before committing.
- Partner with a mortgage broker to structure loans that fit your goals, risk tolerance, and 2025 market conditions.
Bonus: An Alternative Strategy — Using Home Equity To Fund A Stand-Alone Loan
Instead of cross-securitising, many borrowers tap into their home equity to fund a new property. This can be done via a top-up on your existing loan or a separate split loan. You then use these funds as the deposit for a stand-alone loan on the new property.
This strategy keeps your properties financially separate, giving you flexibility and control.
Benefits of Using Home Equity Instead of Cross-Securitisation
- Keeps properties unlinked — each loan stands alone, protecting one property from risks affecting another.
- Simplifies future sales and refinancing — you can sell or refinance each property independently.
- Preserves lender choice — you can shop around for the best rates and terms for each loan.
- Reduces complexity — avoids cross-collateralisation paperwork and multiple property valuations.
Read more: How to use equity to buy a second property
Cross Securitisation Vs Stand Alone Securities Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between cross-collateralisation and stand-alone?
Cross-collateralisation links multiple properties to a single loan, while stand-alone loans secure each property individually. Cross-secured loans can boost borrowing power, but reduce flexibility. Stand-alone loans offer more control, easier refinancing, and clearer equity positions.
What are the cons of cross-collateralisation?
Cross-collateralisation can reduce flexibility, make refinancing harder, and increase risk exposure. Selling one property may require bank revaluation of all linked properties, which can delay or reduce sale proceeds. Borrowers are also tied to one lender, limiting options.
What is cross-collateralisation and cross-securitisation?
Cross-collateralisation, also called cross-securitisation, is a loan structure where multiple properties are used as security for one or more loans. It allows borrowers to leverage existing equity across properties to fund new purchases or reduce Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).
How to document cross-collateralisation?
Banks require formal loan agreements outlining all properties used as security. Valuations for each property are conducted, and borrowers sign mortgage documents linking the assets. A qualified mortgage broker can ensure proper documentation and lender compliance.
What are the tax advantages of a cross-collateralised mortgage?
Using cross-collateralisation can provide potential tax benefits for investment properties, such as claiming interest deductions on the loan portion related to income-producing assets. Consult a tax professional to understand deductions based on your individual situation.
Can I switch from cross-securitisation to stand-alone securities?
Yes, but it requires lender approval and may involve fees. Refinancing or splitting the loan allows each property to stand alone, giving more flexibility for future sales or refinancing. A mortgage broker can guide you through the process.
How does cross-securitisation affect my ability to sell a property?
Selling a cross-secured property usually triggers a revaluation of remaining linked properties. The bank may hold back some sale proceeds to maintain security margins, which can reduce cash available from the sale and slow settlement.
Does cross-securitisation make it easier to grow a portfolio quickly?
Yes. Cross-securitisation allows borrowers to leverage equity from multiple properties, increasing borrowing power. This can help fund new purchases faster than stand-alone loans, especially for investors with strong long-term holdings.
What happens if the market drops while I’m cross-secured?
A market decline increases your combined LVR, which can limit refinancing and borrowing capacity. Stand-alone loans isolate risk to individual properties, but cross-secured loans spread the impact across all linked assets. Careful planning is essential.
Can I mix lenders with stand-alone loans?
Yes. Stand-alone structures allow each property to have a different lender. This flexibility helps borrowers negotiate better interest rates, diversify risk, and maintain clearer equity positions for future sales or refinancing.
Next Steps To Securing Your Investment Property
Our team at Hunter Galloway is here to help you buy a home in Australia. Unlike other mortgage brokers who are just one person operations, we have an entire team of experts dedicated to help make your home loan journey as simple as possible.
If you want to get started, please give us a call on 1300 088 065 or book a free assessment online to see how we can help.
Start again
